• Home
  • About
    • Copyright, Rules, & Terms
  • IPA
  • Links
  • Contact

Crutchfield's Orthoglossary

~ Notes & Comment on Language, Spoken & Written

Crutchfield's Orthoglossary

Tag Archives: gerunds

Writing and Thinking

16 Friday Feb 2018

Posted by J. D. Crutchfield in Grammar, How We Say It, O Tempora! O Mores!

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

agreement, CNN, gerunds, number, paid praters

Dear Reader, maybe you think I’m too hard on our paid praters, the people who make their living by generating verbiage for mass-consumption.  Maybe I am.  After all, they have a twenty-four-hour news cycle to contend with.  They must churn out the words in a constant stream, and they don’t have time to worry about things like grammar and style.

Well, in my opinion, if they don’t have time to write well, they shouldn’t be writing.  Bad writing is a product of sloppy thinking, and it spreads sloppy thinking.  People who read or hear bad writing naturally pick it up and imitate it when they speak or write.  They quit thinking about what they’re saying or writing, and content themselves with saying approximately what they mean to say.

An easy example, which we encounter almost every day, is misplaced number agreement:

The trouble with these airplanes are that they’re too noisy.

(I’m not quoting anybody here, but I’m sure you can find any number of real examples.)  I have the impression that people nowadays get this kind of thing wrong at least as often as they get it right.  The verb is given the number of the nearest noun (“airplanes are”), even if that noun isn’t the agent of the verb (“the trouble . . . are”).

Here’s a more elaborate example by a paid prater:

According to the magazine, McDougal, a Republican, was at first reluctant to speak about her alleged affair during the presidential campaign, fearing that Trump supporters might accuse her of fabricating her account or harming her or her family.

Veronica Stracqualursi, CNN, https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/16/politics/donald-trump-karen-mcdougal-national-enquirer/index.html.

As written, the sentence declares that

  1. McDougal was afraid
  2. McDougal was afraid that Trump supporters might accuse her
  3. McDougal was afraid that Trump supporters might accuse her of fabricating her account
  4. McDougal was afraid that Trump supporters might accuse her of harming her
  5. McDougal was afraid that Trump supporters might accuse her of harming her family.

I’m going to go out on a limb and suggest that that is not what the reporter meant to declare.  I think that what she meant to declare was

  1. McDougal was afraid
  2. McDougal was afraid that Trump supporters might accuse her of fabricating her account
  3. McDougal was afraid that Trump supporters might harm her
  4. McDougal was afraid that Trump supporters might harm her family.

Does it matter that that’s not what she wrote?  You tell me, Dear Reader—but if your answer is “No,” please make an argument to support it.

Archives

  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • August 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • December 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • October 2013

Enter your email address to follow this web log and receive notice of new posts by e-mail.

Join 11 other followers

Tags

activator actuator announcements augmentation disease BBC Beowulf Britspeak button case CNN cock collapse cricket dead metaphor Dictionary.com discharger double-talk effect epicenter escapement Etymonline.com grammar Guardian gun-lock idioms igniter ignition switch impact impact effect implode J. R. R. Tolkien John McCain legalese lever like lock Merriam-Webster metaphor Modern Memos monger mood New York Times number officialese on-switch Open Salon paid praters pallet pawl political double-talk politics pronunciation Razia Iqbal release Salon.com Scientific American short-lived snap solecism starter subjunctive switch synonyms tarred with the same brush Thesaurus trip tripper Tucker Bounds usage vampire site verbs Washington Post whom Wikipedia word inflation

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy